De: procor-bounces@healthnet.org [mailto:procor-bounces@healthnet.org] Em nome de Coleman, Catherine
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 26 de julho de 2007 10:53
Para: procor@healthnet.org
Assunto: [ProCOR] NGO Report on Women and Tobacco
[The following is forwarded from Sara Sanchez Del Mazo [sara.sanchez-del-mazo@sll.se] who moderates the International Network of Women Against Tobacco listserv.
INWAT (www.inwat.org) is a global network of tobacco control specialists dedicated to achieve improved health and greater equality among women and girls in the world by eliminating tobacco use and exposure.]
-------------
Please find below the NGO Report on Women and Tobacco produced by the International Alliance of Women.
NGO REPORT on Women and Tobacco
Cook Islands, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Estonia, Guinea, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, Jordan, Kenya, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Singapore
Submitted by the International Alliance of Women to the 39th session of the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (23 July-10 August 2007, New York)
Tobacco poses a threat to achieving the MDGs. That was the conclusion of a WHO report, The Millennium Development Goals and Tobacco Control (WHO, Geneva, 2002). The study shows an alarming trend that links poverty with tobacco use. Poor families are more likely to have smokers than richer families. They allocate a substantial part of their total expenditures to tobacco, often exceeding what they pay for education or health care. For example, in Indonesia, low income families spend 5-15 percent of their income on tobacco.
* Tobacco is the second major cause of death in the world, killing 4.9 million persons each year. Two-thirds of the poor nations have male smoking rates higher than the 35 percent in the developed world. Male prevalence rates in Estonia (44 percent), Hungary (53 percent), Guinea (58.9 percent), Kenya (66.8 percent), Indonesia (69 percent), Republic of Korea (64.8
percent) and Jordan (48 percent) are examples (country data based on Tobacco Control Country Profile 2003, Atlanta, The American Cancer Society et al, 2003.) Death and disability due to tobacco affects women even if they are not smokers. When the male head of household no longer provides an income, women are forced to enter the labor market or manage farmland. With unequal access to credit, agricultural resources, and financial know-how, rural women suffer dire economic consequences.
* In countries where rates of tobacco use may be declining among men such as in New Zealand, Singapore, Belize, Honduras and Brazil, vigilance is needed as tobacco companies increasingly target women. Marketing tactics have been so successful that in the Cook Islands women smokers (71.1 percent) outnumber men two to one. The results of the Global Youth Tobacco Survey also indicate reasons to be alarmed as many girls in their early teens are taking up smoking. For example, in Jordan (1999), only ten percent of women smoked, but over 15 percent of girls aged 13 to 15 were smokers. These statistics may underestimate how much women really use tobacco as chewing tobacco or tobacco used with betel often go unreported.
* How does tobacco affect food security for women? The WHO reports that globally, 5.3 million hectares of arable land are currently under tobacco cultivation, land that could feed 10 to 20 million people. The economic "benefits" are precarious for women farmers in countries such as Kenya and Indonesia because land that is cleared for tobacco farming and wood-fired curing contributes to serious deforestation. The costs are social as well as economic. Women and girls who work in tobacco production and processing seldom receive a just share of the income. They may experience "green tobacco sickness" from handling tobacco leaves and suffer from respiratory, nerve, skin and kidney damage from pesticides.
* The CEDAW can be called upon to strengthen tobacco control and protect women's rights to health. Economic policies such as tax increases on all tobacco products are effective measures. They increase government revenue while discouraging tobacco use. Women appear to be particularly responsive to these economic measures. Working closely with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the CEDAW committee and government can ensure that the MDG goals are achieved.

Prevelência de Fumantes: 19%

Notícias
Fumantes são 19% no país, diz pesquisaData: 03/08/2007
Levantamento da Unifesp mostra que para 65,8% dos entrevistados o cigarro não deveria ser liberado em restaurantes.Maior prevalência de fumantes ocorre nas faixas etárias entre 35 anos e 44 anos (24,4%) e entre 45 anos e 59 anos (24,8%)
O percentual de fumantes no Brasil está em 19,3%, segundo pesquisa conduzida pela Unifesp (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) e a Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Rio de Janeiro. O estudo, de abrangência nacional, aponta que a prevalência é maior nas faixas etárias entre 35 anos e 44 anos (24,4%) e de 45 anos a 59 anos (24,8%).
Foram entrevistadas 3.007 pessoas no ano passado, por meio de sorteio. Dessas, 66% chegaram a fumar em algum momento da vida -sendo que 21,3% só experimentaram e 15,4% já não tinham o hábito de fumar quando a entrevista foi feita. Cerca de 20% fumam até hoje. Nesse universo, 80% são fumantes ativos, ou seja, consomem tabaco por pelo menos 20 dias ao mês.
Um dos recortes da pesquisa aborda os hábitos dos pais dos fumantes. Foi constatado que 27% dos brasileiros têm pelo menos um pai também fumante. A influência é maior Entre os adolescentes: 45,4% declararam ser filhos de um pai fumante. Entre os adultos, o percentual cai para 25,1%.
A escolaridade também foi analisada. A pesquisa conclui que o nível de instrução do chefe do domicílio também exerce influência no hábito de fumar. Os fumantes, cujo chefe de domicílio tem nível superior não chegam a 9,5%, enquanto aqueles que tem chefe que não completou o nível primário chega a 20,5%.
A maioria dos entrevistados são contrários ao consumo de tabaco em ambientes fechados e de convívio coletivo. Para 65,8% dos entrevistados, o cigarro não deveria ser liberado em restaurantes e cafés, por exemplo. Nos shopping, 74,3% das pessoas desaprovam o fumo. Em escolas, 92,4% dos entrevistados também acham que não se deve fumar.
A opinião se inverte no caso dos bares. Nesses locais, a tendência é haver uma permissividade maior. Somente 39,7% dos entrevistados responderam que não deveria ser permitido fumar nos bares -em nenhuma área.O levantamento será divulgado oficialmente durante o XIX Congresso da Abead (Associação Brasileira de Estudos do Álcool e Outras Drogas), que acontece em setembro no Rio de Janeiro.

Fonte: Folha SP

De: Prof. Simon Chapman [mailto:chapman@globalink.org]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2007 07:12
Para: General Messages
Assunto: The case for plain (generic) tobacco packaging

Becky Freeman and I have produced a comprehensive review of relevant evidence about the plain or generic packaging of tobacco products. It draws from sources including internal tobacco industry documents, tobacco industry trade publications and a recent 2007 Morgan Stanley report which declared plain packaging to be one of three outstanding concerns today (along with tax and hiding retail displays).
The full report in high resolution pdf, replete with many illustrations of how packaging is being used as a key promotional vehicle, is available here:
http://tobacco.health.usyd.edu.au/site/futuretc/pdfs/generic.pdf
Feel free to download and distribute and link on your websites. If you would like to reproduce it in bulk as a lobbying tool in your nation, we would be happy to grant permission but would like to be informed.
Simon Chapman